Case studies

Our approach in practice.

We believe results should be shown, not claimed. This page explains how we work through the situations businesses most often bring to us — and the standard every published case study will meet.

A note on transparency

Why you won't find invented numbers here.

Marketing is full of impressive-sounding percentages with no context, no baseline, and no way to verify them. We don't think that helps anyone make a good decision. We publish a client case study only when the client has approved it and the results can be supported by data, with the time period and measurement method stated.

Until approved case studies are ready to share, the scenarios below describe common patterns we are asked to investigate and how we approach them. They are illustrative composites — not accounts of specific clients — and they contain no performance figures.

01Illustrative scenario

"Our spend keeps rising, but leads haven't moved."

A familiar situation: budgets increase quarter after quarter, platform dashboards look busy, yet the sales team sees no more opportunities than before.

What we examine

  • Search terms and placements behind the extra spend
  • Changes to bidding, match types, or automation settings
  • Whether conversion actions changed definition

Common root causes

  • Broadening that captured lower-intent traffic
  • Automated bidding optimizing toward easy, low-value actions
  • Overlapping campaigns bidding against each other

How we'd approach it

  • Re-anchor optimization to qualified outcomes
  • Restructure and add exclusions to cut irrelevant spend
  • Reallocate budget and measure against a fixed baseline
02Illustrative scenario

"The ad platforms report far more conversions than our CRM."

When every platform's numbers add up to more customers than the business actually won, decisions start resting on fiction.

What we examine

  • Which actions each platform counts as a conversion
  • Tag firing, duplication, and attribution windows
  • How leads are recorded and matched in the CRM

Common root causes

  • Micro-actions counted alongside real leads
  • Duplicate tags or double-firing events
  • Overlapping view-through and click-through credit

How we'd approach it

  • Agree one definition of a lead and a sale
  • Clean up tagging with consent-aware implementation
  • Introduce offline conversion feedback from the CRM
Professionals meeting late in a modern glass-walled office
Every recommendation should be traceable to evidence — and every change measured against an agreed baseline.
03Illustrative scenario

"We get plenty of traffic, but visitors don't enquire."

Paying for clicks that leave without acting is one of the most expensive leaks in any funnel — and one of the most fixable.

What we examine

  • Message match between ads and landing pages
  • Mobile speed, layout, and form length
  • Drop-off points by device and traffic source

Common root causes

  • Generic pages that don't answer the ad's promise
  • Slow or cluttered mobile experiences
  • Forms asking for too much, too soon

How we'd approach it

  • Prioritize fixes by traffic volume and severity
  • Design tests with clear hypotheses
  • Measure conversion quality, not only volume
04Illustrative scenario

"Every channel says it drove the same customer."

Last-click reports reward whichever channel touched the customer last. Budgets follow the credit, and the channels that create demand get cut.

What we examine

  • Attribution models and lookback windows in use
  • Overlap between audiences and retargeting pools
  • Brand search trends alongside upper-funnel activity

Common root causes

  • Channels judged by one metric regardless of role
  • Retargeting taking credit for existing intent
  • No incrementality testing

How we'd approach it

  • Define each channel's role and success metric
  • Use holdout or geo tests where budgets allow
  • Plan budgets on marginal, not average, returns

Our case study standard

How every published case study will be built.

When we share client results, each one will follow the same five-part structure, so you can judge the evidence for yourself.

  1. 01Context

    The business, market, goals, and constraints at the start.

  2. 02Baseline

    Performance before changes, with the period and data source.

  3. 03Diagnosis

    What the audit found and the evidence behind it.

  4. 04Action

    What changed, when, and what else changed at the same time.

  5. 05Verified outcome

    Results with measurement method and timeframe — published only with client approval.

Recognize a scenario?

Let's look at your data together.

An audit applies this approach to your own accounts and shows where the biggest opportunities are.

Request a Marketing Audit